On 2016-06-07 03:09, Alan Gates wrote:
Why wait until the next release to vote on these candidates if they
look ready now? If you are just letting them contribute a bit longer
so that you have a better understanding of whether they will be good
committers that seems fine. But I don’t see how it relates to the
release.
Sure. We will work on it soon.
v1.0 will transform Apache SINGA into a more general machine learning
platform, before that we will proceed to release v0.4 as well. We will
release both next month.
Recent performance studies by other academics confirm the superior
performance of SINGA against the first version of Tensorflow.
Alan.
On Jun 2, 2016, at 19:56, Wang Wei <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Alan,
Thanks for reminding us this issue.
We have some candidate new committers and would like to call for vote
when
the next release is ready (scheduled in July).
regards,
wang wei
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Pravin Chandrasekaran
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Alan,
I am curious to understand more by what you mean. Can we have a chat?
Regards,
Pravin
-------- Original message --------
From: Alan Gates <[email protected]>
Date: 02/06/2016 19:46 (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Feedback from the podling report
I wanted to raise a concern that Singa has been in the incubator for
over
a year now and not added any committers. Growing the community is
one of
the measures of maturity that Apache looks for in graduating projects
from
the incubator. Are there any contributors that look like they might
be
ready for committership soon? If not, do you have any thoughts on
how to
attract some?
Alan.
