-1. In the LICENSE file you note that files are included that are licensed under several BSD license variants. This is fine, except that those licenses need to be placed in the LICENSE file in order to be compliant with the requirements in the BSD license that the license is redistributed with the code.
Alan. > On Aug 18, 2016, at 00:52, WANG Sheng <wan...@comp.nus.edu.sg> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have created a build for Apache SINGA 1.0.0-incubating, release candidate > RC0. > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.0.0/ > > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows: > MD5: 6D 80 06 FD AB 5C 8F EF FA B6 62 4E 73 9A 69 18 > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/dinhtta.asc > > and the signature file is: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/singa/1.0.0/apache-singa-incubating-1.0.0-RC0.tar.gz.asc > > To check the license, you can use the Apache Rat tool as follows: > 1. download & decompress apache rat from > http://creadur.apache.org/rat/download_rat.cgi > 2. run the following command under singa folder: > java -jar /PATH/TO/RAT/apache-rat-0.11.jar -E rat-excludes -d . > > rat_check > 3. check the results in file named "rat_check" > > Please check and vote on releasing this package. The vote is open for at > least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least three +1 votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SINGA 1.0.0-incubating > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > Here is my vote: > +1 > > Regards, > Wang Sheng
