Before to apply the new proposed version number, would it be okay to
take the opportunity for renaming the current "sis-core" module into
"sis-referencing"? This is because most classes in "sis-core" (except
maybe the QuadTree) seem related to referencing. The "sis-referencing"
name would anticipate the merging of Geotk referencing framework.
Martin
Le 01/10/12 00:32, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) a écrit :
Hey Martin,
+1 works for me!
Cheers,
Chris
On Sep 30, 2012, at 4:39 AM, Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
One related question: would it be okay if I rename the version number, currently "0.3-SNAPSHOT", to "0.3-geoapi3.0-SNAPSHOT"? The
reason is that I would like to maintains SIS releases for GeoAPI 3.0, 3.1, etc. The SIS releases would be "0.3-geoapi3.0",
"0.4-geoapi3.0", "0.4-geoapi3.1", etc. This would be a little bit similar to the PostgreSQL driver, which has
"9.1-901.jdbc4" and "9.1-901.jdbc3" releases.
So the branches and version numbers would be:
trunk : 0.3-geoapi3.0-SNAPSHOT
branches/jdk6 : 0.3-jdk6-SNAPSHOT
branches/jdk7 : 0.3-jdk7-SNAPSHOT
