Uploaded the patch here.

https://reviews.apache.org/r/11615/

Thanks!
Travis



On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks, Travis, great!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: [email protected]
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Travis L Pinney <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, June 3, 2013 5:22 PM
> To: dev <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Material for potential volunteer
>
> >I went ahead and checked in code that uses order() instead of extending
> >MappedByteBuffer. After going back over the code, I noticed there was not
> >too many places that needed to be switched.
> >
> >I am working on the patch now.
> >
> >I am assuming this needs to go in sis/trunk/storage/sis-shapefile.
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Travis
> >
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Travis L Pinney
> ><[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> Just an update of the progress I made.
> >>
> >> 1. Switched to org.apache.sis.storage.shapefile for java/tests
> >> 2. Truncated the test shapefiles and checked them in and deleted the
> >> original larger shapefiles.
> >> 3. Switched to using NIO
> >>
> >> The code is here
> >>
> >> https://github.com/tlpinney/shapefile-api
> >>
> >> Currently I have it set up to MMAP the files. I am still using Apache
> >> EndianUtils for reading Little Endian values. I am not sure of the
> >> advantage of calling foo.order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN) instead of using
> >> the EndianUtils, but I will extend the MappedByteBuffer so the api is
> >> easier to use when switching between Little Endian and Big Endian.
> >>Either
> >> method of reading Little Endian values can be swapped out without
> >>changing
> >> the api in the future.
> >>
> >> Maybe something like?
> >>
> >> foo.getLEInt()
> >> foo.getLELong()
> >>
> >> for dealing with Little Endian values?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Travis
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Adam Estrada
> >><[email protected]>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Travis!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Travis L Pinney
> >>><[email protected]
> >>> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Thanks for the suggestions.
> >>> >
> >>> > I will update the packaging to be consistent with apache-sis and use
> >>> > ReviewBoard for the patch.
> >>> >
> >>> > For the tests, I will regenerate the shapefiles with a subset of the
> >>> data
> >>> > to keep them at a reasonable size. This will allow testing for all
> >>> types of
> >>> > data (Polyline, Shapefile, and Point for now). I agree it is not
> >>>optimal
> >>> > for basic tests to depend on large files.
> >>> >
> >>> > Using java.nio will be better than using RandomAccessFile. I will
> >>>look
> >>> into
> >>> > getting that switched over.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks!
> >>> > Travis
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Martin Desruisseaux <
> >>> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hello Travis
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks for this work! I had a quick look at the code on GitHub,
> >>>and I
> >>> > > would like to do the following suggestions:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >  *
> >>> > >
> >>> > >    About the test data, the ANC90Ply_4326.dbf files could easily be
> >>> > >    committed on SVN since it is only 19 kb. However the other test
> >>> > >    files (SignedBikeRoute_4326 and ABRALicenseePt_4326) are 2.4 and
> >>> 3.1
> >>> > >    Mb big. We have not yet established a mechanism for such large
> >>>test
> >>> > >    files. We may need to setup some FTP server for large test
> >>>files,
> >>> > >    and design the tests in such a way that those tests are
> >>>optional.
> >>> > >    Maybe for now it would be better to commit only
> >>> ANC90Ply_4326.dbf...
> >>> > >
> >>> > >  *
> >>> > >
> >>> > >    The ShapeFile class uses java.io.RandomAccessFile for reading
> >>>data,
> >>> > >    followed by calls to org.apache.commons.io.**EndianUtils for
> >>> > >    converting bytes to double (or other primitive types) while
> >>>taking
> >>> > >    endianness in account. Would it be possible to use
> >>> > >    java.nio.channels.**ReadableChannel with java.nio.ByteBuffer
> >>> instead?
> >>> > >    It would take care of the above for you, potentially much more
> >>> > >    efficiently.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks again!
> >>> > >
> >>> > >     Martin
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Le 03/06/13 01:47, Travis L Pinney a écrit :
> >>> > >
> >>> > >  Hello everyone,
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I started working on a very rough prototype that can read in
> >>> Shapefiles.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> https://github.com/tlpinney/**shapefile-api<
> >>> > https://github.com/tlpinney/shapefile-api>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> In order to write a patch to submit, where would this component
> >>> reside
> >>> > in
> >>> > >> the Apache SIS project?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Thanks,
> >>> > >> Travis
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to