+1 Martin -- if that causes those classes to be included (as opposed
to excluded like they used to be), feel free to remove the pluginManagement
tags I added.

Cheers,
Chris

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++






-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
Organization: Geomatys
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, June 8, 2013 12:55 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Proposal for a command line interface

>Hello Travis
>
>Le 08/06/13 04:11, Travis L Pinney a écrit :
>> I am using the latest stable version of eclipse.
>Have you tried to build from the command line first? "mvn install"
>should work fine. I'm not familiar with Eclipse, but maybe it will be
>happier after a successful normal Maven build.
>
>
>Le 08/06/13 04:33, Travis L Pinney a écrit :
>> These patches fix some of the errors in eclipse.
>>
>> (...snip...)
>>     <build>
>> +    <pluginManagement>
>>       <plugins>
>> (...snip...)
>>       </plugins>
>> +    </pluginManagement>
>>     </build>
>
>The addition of those </pluginManagement> elements basically ask Maven
>to not execute the plugins anymore. One can see in the generated JAR
>file that the com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller classes are not excluded
>anymore. Unless anyone object, I will remove the <pluginManagement>, but
>keep the <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> (not necessary
>according Maven documentation, but maybe Eclipse want us to be more
>specific). Could you provide us some details about the build failure
>that you get? I would like to see how we can fix it.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Martin
>

Reply via email to