Hi Martin & Adam,

No worries on this one, we all learn through the process and I learned the hard 
way. As Chris pointed out to earlier on this thread, one of the important 
aspect in ASF is getting the releases. We can informally roll-out RC's for 
testing. But before we can vote on a release, that has to be done on 
cryptographically signed artifacts. Also there are constraints on where the 
signed KEYS are located and so forth. Also, we need to properly follow the way 
we distribute release notes and also publish artifacts to nexus repo so 
downstream users can get them. 

I will be happy to help put together some detailed instructions on the website 
so we will have them for future. Here is a stating point on Airavata release 
management - http://airavata.apache.org/development/release-management.html 

Suresh

On Jun 26, 2013, at 7:34 PM, Adam Estrada <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK guys...moving this to a [VOTE] thread...
> 
> A
> 
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Travis L Pinney wrote:
> 
>> +1 for Friday release
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Adam and Chris
>>> 
>>> So Friday would be RC 1. I will read more attentively the release process
>>> documentation tomorrow. Thanks for the link and for your help
>>> 
>>>   Martin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 25/06/13 20:37, Adam Estrada a écrit :
>>> 
>>> That sounds good Martin! I will work with you and Mattmann on the release
>>>> process. This is very exciting!!!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
>>>> martin.desruisseaux@geomatys.**fr <[email protected]>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello all
>>>>> 
>>>>> Unless I spot a significant problem, I think that I could fix tomorrow as
>>>>> my last testing day. I could also eventually process to the following
>>>>> minor
>>>>> changes on Thursday:
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Replace LatLon by DirectPosition2D
>>>>> * Replace LatLonRect by Envelope2D
>>>>> 
>>>>> The two above classes were defined in SIS 0.2. The proposed replacement
>>>>> are implementations of OGC/ISO objects.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We could target a release on Friday if peoples are okay with that.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to