Up to you Martin. It's easy to generate an RC#2. At the same time if you VOTE +1 for RC1, and we get 1 more PMC RC #1, we can push this release, which is functional and good; sure it doesn't handle the minus sign for negative angles, but at the same time, we can easily spin a 0.4 RC #1 soon thereafter releasing 0.3 RC 1.
My VOTE would be to simply get another +1 on RC 1 for 0.3 and then push 0.4 with the update shortly thereafter. More releases the better, more RCs are fine, but not as optimal as more releases. Cheers, Chris ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Adam Estrada <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 3:53 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SIS 0.3 RC1 >Martin, > >Good catch! I don't see any issues with submitting another candidate >release but I don't know how the ASF handles this sort of thing. I noted >in >the board report that we would have an official release *soon* but I would >like to get it correct the first time around. What do others have to say? > >Thanks, >Adam > > >On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Martin Desruisseaux < >[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all >> >> Thanks Chris for checking! >> >> Vote result so far is: >> >> Chris Mattman: +1 >> Martin Desruisseaux: 0 (reason below) >> >> Reason for my 0 vote is that I noticed the following bug today: angles >> formatted by AngleFormat missed the minus sign for negative angles in >>the >> (-1° ... 0°) range [SIS-120]. I ported the fix to the 0.3 branch. >>Should I >> submit a RC2? I could do that tomorrow in probably 30 minutes, since >> javadoc does not need to be regenerated. >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> [SIS-120] >>https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/SIS-120<https://issues.apache.org >>/jira/browse/SIS-120> >> >>
