Hi All,

Here is the hangout URL - 
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/c1dc5f8a714fab559a9da2f05d3cad916595ecde?authuser=0&hl=en

We will post the discussion summary to the mailing list as well.

Suresh

On Sep 12, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Nadeem Anjum <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I am okay with either 8pm or 9pm US eastern time.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nadeem
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Ra myaa <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi,
>  i would prefer earlier - 8 or so sicne i do not have itnernet at home yet
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> How about a google hangout today at 9pm US eastern time (6 pm pacific), 6.30 
> am IST?
> 
> Suresh
> 
> On Sep 10, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Arvind Verma <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Everyone
> > This looks very promising and I think we should discuss this together.
> > Suresh- can we meet and go through what has been done with Ramyaa, Adam and 
> > Nadeem through Skype? We should also discuss how we can turn this into a 
> > publishable paper.
> > Except M W afternoons-evenings I am available at all other times
> > Arvind
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Nadeem Anjum <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have enabled the agent to commit crimes, which is decided by a number of 
> > factors like reward associated with the crime, risk involved, number of 
> > times the spot has been visited, whether police is present in vicinity, 
> > whether the guardian of the spot is away . The simulation is being run for 
> > two weeks. For the first week the agent commits no crime and just gets 
> > acquainted with the spots. In the second week the agent commits crime based 
> > on the above factors.
> >
> > You can have a look at it here: http://gw76.iu.xsede.org/criminfo/
> >
> > A sample simulation has been saved by the name - "crimetest" . You can 
> > click on load and enter - crimetest - to view it. You can also run a new 
> > simulation on cities in taiwan (say taipei).
> >
> > We have four global variables:
> >       • risk_avoidance : a value between 0 and 1 (generated randomly)
> >       • profit_seeking : a value between 0 and 1 (generated randomly)
> >       • maxprofitpossible : set to 100 for this simulation
> >       • maxriskpresent : set to 100 for this simulation
> > Crime Spots are labelled as "CS-n [reward, risk, p ,g ,f]" on the map, where
> >
> > where,
> >       • n is the id of the crime spot,
> >       • reward is profit value associated with the spot - this is 
> > initialized as a random number generated between 0 and maxprofitpossible
> >       • risk = inherent_risk + 
> > risk_due_to_the_number_of_times_the_spot_is_visited
> >       • inherent_risk is  initialized as a random number generated between 
> > 0 and maxriskpresent.
> >       • risk_due_to_the_number_of_times_the_spot_is_visited = 
> > num_times_visited * 0.02 * maxriskpresent
> >       • p = probability that police is present in the vicinity of the spot
> >       • g = probability that the guardian of the spot is not present at the 
> > spot
> >       • f = number of times crime has been committed at this spot
> > The algorithm for deciding whether the agent commits a crime is as follows:
> >
> > //check patrolling police presence
> > tmp  = random num between 0 and 1
> > if(tmp > p){  //patrolling police not present
> >        tmp  = random num between 0 and 1
> >        r = risk
> >         if(tmp < g){  // guardian is away
> >              r = r/2   //risk is reduced to half . this is only for this 
> > particular case. the risk value                              //stored for 
> > this spot remains unchanged
> >         }
> >         tmp = random num between 0 and 1
> >         if( tmp > risk_avoidance*r/maxriskpresent.){     //agent decides to 
> > take the risk
> >                tmp = random num between 0 and 1
> >                if(tmp < profit_seeking*reward/maxprofitpossible){  //reward 
> > is good enough
> >                      commit_crime
> >                }
> >         }
> > }
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nadeem.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to