Hello all
With Johann working on the GPX format, a question is which (if any)
naming convention to use for storage modules (i.e. modules that read and
write some file formats). Currently there is none; the only stores are:
Names alternative 1:
* sis-netcdf
* sis-shapefile
We could prefix with "sis-store-" like below:
Names alternative 2:
* sis-store-netcdf
* sis-store-shapefile
We could also be more specific by separating the store in 3 categories:
those reading features ("sis-feature-"), those reading coverages
("sis-coverage-"), and those that get the data from a distant machine
through web services ("sis-client-"):
Names alternative 3:
* sis-coverage-netcdf
* sis-feature-shapefile
However one issue with alternative 3 is that some formats does not fit
entirely in any category. For example NetCDF can be used for both
coverages and features.
Alternatives 2 and 3 would impacts users of those modules since they
would need to change their dependency in the pom.xml file.
Does anyone has a preference for the module naming convention? (for now
my own personal preference would be alternative 2, but I'm not sure)
Martin
