Hi Martin,
could it be possible, that something is wrong with the Snapshot repository?

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/sis/core/sis-referencing/0.8-jdk8-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml

The version value of the maven-metadata.xml doesn’t fit to the available 
version.

E.g. maven-metadata.xml defines that the latest snapshot version is: 
<value>0.8-jdk8-20170717.141623-445</value> but such a version doesn’t exist at 
 the repository.
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/sis/core/sis-referencing/0.8-jdk8-SNAPSHOT/

The latest version in the repository is 
sis-referencing-0.8-jdk8-20170717.141622-445.jar.

That works:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/sis/core/sis-referencing/0.8-jdk8-SNAPSHOT/sis-referencing-0.8-jdk8-20170717.141622-445.jar

That doesn’t work:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/sis/core/sis-referencing/0.8-jdk8-SNAPSHOT/sis-referencing-0.8-jdk8-20170717.141623-445.jar

Best Regards,
Steve

From: Martin Desruisseaux [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2017 12:16 AM
To: HRUDA Steve <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: CRS.findOperation WGS84 to EPSG:20249 without using the EPSG 
geodetic dataset


Hello Steve

The issue should be fixed now, on trunk and development branches JDK7 and JDK8. 
If you are using Maven, snapshot builds are available on 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots. Please let me know if you encounter 
other issues.

    Martin



Le 13/07/2017 à 17:08, HRUDA Steve a écrit :
Perfect - Thanks Martin!

From: Martin Desruisseaux [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 5:01 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; HRUDA Steve 
<[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CRS.findOperation WGS84 to EPSG:20249 without using the EPSG 
geodetic dataset


Hello Steve

Le 13/07/2017 à 14:44, HRUDA Steve a écrit :

is it possible to transform a WGS84 coordinate to EPSG:20249 without using the 
EPSG geodetic dataset? I tried to find a CoordinateOperation based on 
EPSG:20249’s WKT 1.0 definition which includes the toWGS84 parameters, but I 
got the following exception: (...snip...)

CRS.findOperation(…) should work by itself (with limited capabilities) even in 
absence of EPSG geodetic dataset. The OperationNotFoundException is probably a 
bug. I reproduced it on my local machine and filled a JIRA task:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIS-364

We will try to fix it in the next few days, since I suspect that it will be a 
simple fix (probably just one or two lines doing the wrong check).

    Martin




Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H.
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43 
(1) 9610567-0
Eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Wien, Firmenbuch-Nr.: FN 116859 b
Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer / VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Steuer-Nummer: 
264/4807

This E-Mail has been sent on behalf of the company Intergraph Ges.m.b.H.
Authorised Managing Directors: Maximilian Weber
Registered office and Austrian headquarters: Margaretenstr. 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, 
Austria, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0
The company is recorded at the commercial court of Vienna under the company 
register number FN 116859 b
VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Austrian Tax ID: 264/4807

Diese E-Mail (mit zugehörigen Dateien) enthält möglicherweise Informationen, 
die vertraulich sind, dem Urheberrecht unterliegen oder ein Geschäftsgeheimnis 
darstellen. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, 
benachrichtigen Sie uns bitte umgehend, indem Sie eine Antwort senden, und 
löschen Sie bitte diese E-Mail und Ihre Antwort darauf. Sämtliche aufgeführten 
Ansichten oder Meinungen sind ausschließlich diejenigen des Autors und 
entsprechen nicht notwendigerweise denen des Unternehmens Intergraph.

This E-Mail (and any attachments) may be confidential and protected by legal 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately 
by replying to the sender and delete this E-Mail and your reply from your 
system. All the views and opinions published here are solely based on the 
author's own opinion and should not be considered necessarily as reflecting the 
opinion of Intergraph.




Reply via email to