SIS currently has the following modules: * "sis-feature", released in SIS 0.8. * "sis-raster", never released yet.
I propose to move "sis-raster" classes into the "sis-feature" module. The reason is that those modules are unlikely to be used independently. The next module in the dependency chain is "sis-storage", and that module needs those two modules anyway because many storages (netCDF files, Geopackage, PostGIS database…) can contain both kind of data (features and rasters). The module name "sis-feature" would still be appropriate even for raster data if we take the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) point of view, which considers "grid coverage" as a kind of "feature" even if the API differ. The package names would be the same. Since "sis-raster" has never been released yet, no application using SIS releases would be impacted. Is there any comment or objection? Martin
