Thanks all for the tests.
Le 13/05/2022 à 11:29, Alexis Manin a écrit :
I'm only wondering about jakarta binaries (jakarta.activation and
jakarta.xml.bind-api). Should we not include a copy of the Eclipse
license somewhere ?
It is cited in the NOTICE file. This is my understanding of how the
legal stuff is handled at Apache, but we should probably double-check.
I've not done much test with sis and sisfx commands though, because
sis-epsg-1.2 jar is not yet deployed to the official location (i.e
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sis/non-free/sis-epsg/1.2/sis-epsg-1.2.jar”),
which limit test possibilities.
Testing this release candidate with EPSG database requires modifying the
sis or sisfx shell scripts for adding the following option to the java
command:
-Dorg.apache.sis.epsg.downloadURL=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesis-1037/org/apache/sis/non-free/sis-epsg/1.2/sis-epsg-1.2.jar
This is of course unconvenient. For the next release, we should provide
an easier mechanism for specify the staging repository URL. Maybe an
optional configuration file to put in the SIS_DATA directory?
Another bug that I noticed is that when running the JavaFX application,
the offer to download EPSG database appears on the console instead of a
GUI window. This is a confusion caused by sis-console and sis-javafx
being both on the classpath. I will try to fix that in the next release.
Martin
