Hello all
Yes, the goal is indeed to move to at least Java 17 (maybe 21). The
intermediate step to a lower version is only for testing if it causes
any reaction from users. The intermediate step will not stand long if we
make the next SIS releases more quickly, which is desirable anyway. If
we release SIS 1.8 before the end of the year, maybe the Java version
upgrades would be quick enough?
Martin
Le 15/10/2026 à 09:06, Johann Sorel via dev a écrit :
Hello,
I agree too, we should move to at least 17.
versions 12 to 16 have only minor improvements.
With 17 at least we would have an LTS and useful new features : text
blocks, records, switch, sealed classes.
I would even jump to 22 to have Panama if it was just me.
In the past I would agree that updating a JVM could be a trouble, but
today,
with all the security concerns and tools like Docker, updating is much
easier and becomes a real need.
If you check Oracle JDK download page :
https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/downloads/
You can't get version 17 / 11 / 8 without login in.
So maybe 21 should be the new lowest limit.
Johann
