Do we also want to discuss keeping only one format for the original distribution packages too? If yes, then it’s a typo:
Option 1, distribution packages are: apache-skywalking-apm-bin.tar.gz OR apache-skywalking-apm-bin.zip apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.tar.gz OR apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.zip Option 2, distribution packages are: apache-skywalking-apm-bin.tar.gz AND apache-skywalking-apm-bin.zip apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.tar.gz AND apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.zip kezhenxu94 > 在 2019年11月17日，23:39，Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 写道： > > Zhenxu Ke > > I think Option 1 has a typo? Should both are OR? > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > kezhenxu94 <[email protected]> 于2019年11月17日周日 下午11:14写道： > >> Hi the SkyWalking Community, I've opened a pull request[1] >> to support ElasticSearch 7 as backend storage, it assembles another >> distribution package >> `apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.tar.gz/apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.zip` >> along with the existed >> `apache-skywalking-apm-bin.tar.gz/apache-skywalking-apm-bin.zip`, >> so I'm wondering whether we should provide two formats for the **new >> package for ES7 storage** >> or only one format is enough, say: >> >> >> Option 1, distribution packages are: >> apache-skywalking-apm-bin.tar.gz AND apache-skywalking-apm-bin.zip >> apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.tar.gz OR apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.zip >> >> >> Option 2, distribution packages are: >> apache-skywalking-apm-bin.tar.gz AND apache-skywalking-apm-bin.zip >> apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.tar.gz AND >> apache-skywalking-apm-bin-es7.zip >> >> >> the latter requires uploading two formats of the package, what do you >> think? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/3870 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> GitHub @kezhenxu94 >> Apache SkyWalking, Apache Dubbo
