Hongtao Gao <[email protected]> 于2019年12月11日周三 上午10:03写道：
> I want a 6.6.0 with elasticsearch 7.x support that will be a long term > version for our user. > Oh, you mean ES 7.x, then I think it makes sense to keep 6.x on 1.6 as we at least are going to release 6.6.0 with new UI, instance relationship and ES7 supports. Then we could do adding `6.x` branch(with branch protection too), and do supports there. Change master to 7.x. As a result, 6.6+ could still be released on 6.x official branch, if any committers want to do that. Is this good for you? Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2019年12月11日周三 上午9:58写道： > > > Hongtao Gao <[email protected]> 于2019年12月11日周三 上午9:53写道： > > > > > I did some research on this topic, here's what I got from > > > https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/java-se-support-roadmap.html > > > > > > 1. JDK 6 has gone through "extended support" last year, so it makes > sense > > > to remove it from our agent support list. > > > 2. JDK 7 is a reasonable minimum version to support because the user > can > > > still get "extended support" if they want to pay some fee to Oracle. > > > > > > And my last suggestion is to provide a stable release which still > > supports > > > JDK6, some user who want to use JDK6 can enjoy it. > > > > > > > Hi Gao > > > > What kind of stable release do you propose? The last SkyWalking 6.5.0 > agent > > is a stable release for 6.x protocol for a long time. > > And I think we have no plan to break the protocol in the short term. > > Do you want a new 6.6.0 release for 1.6? > > > > Then we move to SkyWalking 7.x based on 1.7+ or 1.8+ agent? Due we may > > already have decided moving to 7.x as we are working on Qiuxia's proposal > > about new Browser monitoring component. :) > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > Hongtao Gao > > > > > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2019年12月11日周三 上午8:41写道： > > > > > > > Hi All dev team > > > > > > > > This is a super important discussion and may require a vote later. > > > > SkyWalking now supports JDK 6-13 in the agent side for a long time, > and > > > is > > > > suffering the risk of RPC component bug too. gRPC has given up the > > > supports > > > > for JDK6 one year before. > > > > Also ref to RedHat OpenJDK maintenance plan[1], OpenJDK6 has not been > > > > supported in December 2016. Oracle JDK has similar storay. > > > > > > > > I want to initial that, SkyWalking should decide to give up the > support > > > on > > > > JDK 1.6, and move to higher JDK requirement. The question will be, > does > > > JDK > > > > 1.7 or 1.8 make more sense? > > > > > > > > All people in the dev channel, your responses are super important. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013 > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > > > > > > Apache SkyWalking > > > > Apache Incubator > > > > Apache ShardingSphere, ECharts, DolphinScheduler podlings > > > > Zipkin > > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Hongtao Gao > > > > > > Apache SkyWalking && Apache ShardingSphere > > > Twitter, @hanahmily > > > > > > > > -- > Hongtao Gao > > Apache SkyWalking && Apache ShardingSphere > Twitter, @hanahmily >
