Yes, one index, and one record for all these. I will work on new percentile func in OAL implementation after the PR gets merged :)
I think this would be helpful for performance, and customized extension for sure. Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Jian Tan <[email protected]> 于2020年1月10日周五 下午2:25写道： > Does that mean 50,75,90,95,99's data will record into one index? > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2020年1月10日周五 下午2:22写道： > > > Hi > > > > I am proposing this new query API[1] for 7.0.0. Once it gets merged, the > > following changes will remove the old p50-p99 metrics, like this > > > > service_p99 = from(Service.latency).p99(10); > > service_p95 = from(Service.latency).p95(10); > > service_p90 = from(Service.latency).p90(10); > > service_p75 = from(Service.latency).p75(10); > > service_p50 = from(Service.latency).p50(10); > > > > And relaced by > > > service_pertentile = from(Service.latency).percentile(50,75,90,95,99) > > > > Query side will use `service_pertentile` as metrics with the new API to > get > > full values. > > > > Zhenxu Ke > > Could you submit an issue of CLI to track this? Because p50 will not be > > queryable from the old API anymore. > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking-query-protocol/pull/28 > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > -- > Jian Tan > Apache SkyWalking Committer && PMC, DaoCloud Labs > Twitter, @tanjian2015 >
