No, it wouldn't. SkyWalking as the APM, having more complex protocol than other two. I have tried to do format transform, read Zipkin receiver, there is an experimental feature there. But in all practices, it is not suitable for production.
Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Geek Tcp <[email protected]> 于2020年1月19日周日 上午9:41写道： > yeah, I see the explain( > > https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docs/en/FAQ/why_mq_not_involved.md > ) > But, > If Oap server before MQ , Data format conversion module after MQ, > Skywalking will be completely compatible with other software ,for example: > zipkin, jaeger ,or the other soft which supported opentrace. > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 9:26 AM Sheng Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Geek > > > > Which part? I think the document has explained why there isn't such a > > mechanism in the upstream. > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > Geek Tcp <[email protected]> 于2020年1月19日周日 上午9:22写道： > > > > > Hi ! > > > I see the structure on the site: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docs/en/FAQ/MQ-involved-architecture.png > > > > > > Will Skywalking support MQ in future? > > > > > >
