Hi I want to remind you all, this PR is closing to be ready. If you have objections to keeping in 8.5.0, please make sure you reply here. https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/6499
Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 Jian Tan <[email protected]> 于2021年3月8日周一 下午4:04写道： > +1 (binding) to 8.5.0 > > Sheng Wu <[email protected]> 于2021年3月8日周一 上午10:19写道： > > > Hongtao > > > > Do you mean +1 binding to stay in 8.5.0? > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > Hongtao Gao <[email protected]> 于2021年3月8日周一 上午10:08写道： > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 18:07, Sheng Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi SkyWalking team > > > > > > > > With receiving Jiapeng's optimization PR[1] about ElasticSearch > > storage, > > > > technically, this is a very good enhancement to reduce the payload of > > the > > > > ES server. But also, as I mentioned here[2], the index policy > changed. > > > > I want to ask the whole community, whether we should change the > version > > > to > > > > 9.0 after this PR merges. > > > > Personally, I can't see much change in SkyWalking's design, streaming > > > core, > > > > and most other features. This may be a break enhancement, but it is > > not a > > > > very big issue, as the agent->server protocol keeps unchanged. > > > > My idea is to +1 for keeping in 8.5.0. All committers and PMC > members, > > > > welcome to vote in this format, > > > > > > > > > +/- 1 (binding if PMC) to version number > > > > > > > > Such as, mine is +1 (binding) to 8.5.0 > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/6499 > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/issues/6411 > > > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jian Tan > Apache SkyWalking Committer && PMC, DaoCloud Labs > Twitter, @tanjian2015 >
