About more aggressive, do we have any tests or do we have anyone to run some perf. tests on JDK 17 as a comparison?
Sheng Wu 吴晟 Twitter, wusheng1108 陆家靖 <lujiajing1...@gmail.com> 于2023年2月13日周一 21:35写道： > > +1 > > Shall we move directly to JDK17 as Spring Boot 3 has done? > > The overall performance in JDK17 is much better than the previous versions. > And ZGC is production ready since JDK15. I suppose OAP would benefit from > this. > > Regards, > Jiajing > > Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> 于2023年2月13日周一 21:27写道： > > > > Agree. With a server, we could upgrade to a newer version of JDK. > > Let's see whether we could commit JDK 11 and JDK 17 compiling support, > > and run in JDK 11 officially. > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > kezhenxu94 <kezhenx...@apache.org> 于2023年2月13日周一 21:14写道： > > > > > > Hi all, recently I've merged a pull request[1] that migrates our tests in > > > main repo > > > from junit 4 to junit 5, I've also verified the tests passed in Java 11 > > > and above, > > > now, I'm proposing to upgrade the minimum required Java version, including > > > development environment (JDK version), and runtime environment (JRE > > > version) to Java 11. > > > > > > Java 8 is a popular version, there are a lot of projects still using it, > > > but fact is fact, Java 8 is really old and there are lots of fascinating > > > features > > > in Java 11 that we will benefit in our development experience, there are > > > also > > > some performance improvements that we will benefit at runtime, so I would > > > be > > > really excited if we could bump up the Java version to Java 11. > > > > > > What do you think? If you have any concern, please reply here and we can > > > discuss > > > more before we make a decision, if you are excited too to upgrade the > > > Java version, > > > please vote here! > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/pull/10382
