Endre Stølsvik wrote: > | They are not warnings and they are not errors. They are also too verbose > for debug. > > They would fit in trace, wouldn't they?
I currently put them in trace - but then you get the problem that if you turn on trace - all the stack traces can obscure all the other trace. See my last posting with Subject "Re: Ignore method" for a real world example complaint I received this morning. The problem with just putting them in a X level is that on/off is not enough. You need the logger to react to the ignore signature or the ignore marker and be able to log nothing, just the exception toString, a summary of the stack trace, the whole stack trace, the whole hierarchy of nested exceptions. cheers _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
