At 01:07 PM 2/2/2006, Boris Unckel wrote:
Move forward! I will do the changes in x4juli with the next release candidate of SLF4J. I did worry about the version numbering (changes in the RC phase) but I did not worry about the change itself, neither for slf4j nor x4juli.
That sounds very good. And yes, important changes in RC phase are not ideal, to say the least.
I am sorry not having published anything in the last weeks. I am busy at work (currently _really_ fulltime) plus my studies at the German VAWi.
Having to split one's attention between oss projects, one's job and family is a well known concern. The important thing is to enjoy the oss work. If it's fun, it's easier to find the time. :-)
> Subject to Boris' consent, I hope to release 1.0RC6 in the next few > days. Releasing a new version is good - as it means to have a stable interface for the future. Most important users should notice that they cannot mix implementations (x4juli 0.6 with the SLF4J > 1.0RC6).
Doesn't x4juli 0.6 include the SLF4J classes? If that is the case and under the condition clients do not use markers, they should be able to transparently switch between x4juli 0.6 and any binding for SLF4J 1.0RC6 or later.
Regards Boris
-- Ceki Gülcü _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
