Along those same lines a protected default constructor would help too
On 2/12/07, Eric Crahen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do the NOPLogger methods need to be final? I was hoping to subclass this for use in unit testing. I basically have to write my own NOPLogger in order to be able to override error() and other things at different to assert the correct logging happens. Can these methods be made non-final? People use these through an inteface anyways, is there a benefit I'm missing? -- - Eric
-- - Eric
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
