Hi Boris, Thank your for the clarification. The 1.3 release fixes 2 relatively critical problems. As such, I would like to get 1.3 out the door ASAP. I would appreciate if you could file a bug report so that the JCL 1.1 can be dealt with promptly, as in SLF4J 1.3.1.
Does that sound OK? At 06:18 PM 2/24/2007, Boris Unckel wrote: >Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > At 06:03 PM 2/24/2007, Boris Unckel wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Ceki Gülcü wrote: > >> > >>> Any other issues that need to be dealt with? > >>> > >> I know this is the second time I post this: > >> I am still not happy with the underlying JCL Release. 1.0.4 is old and > >> 1.1 is out since 10 May 2006. > >> > > > > You mean the JCL 1.0.4 dependency in slf4j-jcl, right? > > >The dependency in slf4j-jcl is one point. >The other one is jcl104-over-slf4j >org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory (slightly modified for slf4j purposes) >org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException >org.apache.commons.logging.Log > >The LogFactory has definitely improvements, i.E. a diagnostic function. >For the other two classes - even if in the original JCL sources has just >JavaDoc been modified an update is worthy. > >Regards >Boris > >_______________________________________________ >dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
