At 09:07 PM 3/23/2007, Boris Unckel wrote: >Hello, > >I do like the concept of SLF4J very much - it is interface based and >very easy to use: simply change one jar.
Thanks Boris. >There were some discussions on the JCL mailing list to stop any >further development and with an approach to use JUL as default for >any (new) commons libraries. I think defaulting to JUL would be a serious misreading the Java universe. >I have created a JCL version (called 2.0.0) in the style of SLF4J. > >I hope this is seen as "learning by example of a good design" and not >as stealing an idea by most SLF4J developers. It looks like you have copied code from SLF4J without appropriate attribution. IANAL, but I think you cannot just remove the MIT license and replace it with another. On the other hand MIT is a very liberal license, so maybe removing the license is OK. >Regards >Boris -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
