Sure, the indentation would be consistent with the coding standards for
the project. My personal style is as shown so it invariably shows
through on occasion. I noticed in the commit log that developers is
spelled incorrectly. I will fix that.
Ceki Gulcu wrote:
> Hello Ralph,
>
> Thank you for documenting the org.slf4j.ext package. My recent commit below
> brings changes in indentation which should be invisible to users. Otherwise,
> I
> added a reference to XLogger and XLoggerFactory in the javadocs.
>
> If you don't mind, I would like to change the indentation of sample code from
>
> void foo()
> {
> whatever..
> }
>
> to
>
> void foo() {
> whatever..
> }
>
> Release of SLF4J 1.5.4, which fixes critical bug 106, should follow within
> the
> next few hours.
>
> http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Author: ceki
>> Date: Thu Oct 16 17:27:03 2008
>> New Revision: 1199
>>
>> Modified:
>> slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html
>>
>> Log:
>> - mostly indentation changes
>>
>> Otherwise,
>>
>> - added a reference to XLogger javadocs
>> - added a reference to XLoggerFactory javadocs
>> - explicitly was spelled as explicitely
>>
>> Modified: slf4j/trunk/slf4j-site/src/site/pages/extensions.html
>> ==============================================================================
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
