http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111





--- Comment #5 from Ceki Gulcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-11-20 16:52:47 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think this solution would fulfill my purposes, although it has the drawback,
> that always an JUL-Configurationfile is needed.
> Perhaps you can provide a programmatic way of configuring JUL, so that no
> configuration file is needed. Such a solution would result in another
> install-Method, that overwrites the current JUL-Configuration, as I proposed 
> in
> my solution.

It is not SLF4JBridgeHandler's responsibility to configure j.u.l.
Quoting the SLF4J FAQ [1]

  SLF4J is only a facade, meaning that it does not provide a complete
  logging solution. Operations such as configuring appenders or setting
  logging levels cannot be performed with SLF4J. [cut]

[1] http://slf4j.org/faq.html#when


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to