http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116
--- Comment #21 from Ceki Gulcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-03 20:44:42 --- (In reply to comment #20) > Several things about this bother me. > 1. Although Ceki is correct that entry and exit wouldn't need these > extensions, > there is no reason the formatter can't be smart enough to handle the old > syntax > and the new syntax. I think that any formatter smart enough to handle both the existing syntax and and new syntax is going to be slow, or comparatively slower than the existing formatter, but I'd love to be proven wrong. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
