http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116
--- Comment #30 from Ken Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-04 23:12:31 --- (In reply to comment #29) > OK. So in addition to formatting parameters the FormatModifier is also in > charge of obtaining the message. How? Are you assuming that standard resource > bundles are OK? In my applications they might not be. FormatModifier is an interface with a single method: String modifyFormat(String format, Object[] args) My plan was to provide a ResourceBundleFormatModifier implementation using standard resource bundles. This would have two constructors, one passed a Locale, and a no-args constructor using the default Locale. Users would also be free to write their own implementation of FormatModifier to meet their own needs. > I'm not sure I agree that SLF4J should become this complex. My proposal does not modify core SLF4J in any way, so I don't agree that it's making it more complex. All of the code would be in SLF4J extensions and would only be used, or known about, by a minority of users with special requirements. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
