http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138
Joern Huxhorn <jo...@huxhorn.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jo...@huxhorn.de
--- Comment #11 from Joern Huxhorn <jo...@huxhorn.de> 2009-10-27 23:43:07 ---
Łukasz,
just out of curiosity, where is that behavior described? What's the rationale
behind if, if it is expected behavior of WLS?
Since this is just a warning that isn't preventing SLF4J from working as
expected I tend to agree with Ceki about not working around platform bugs.
Sure, the fix is really simple and I highly doubt that it would introduce any
problem but, as syvalta mentioned, fixing this here in SLF4J would actually
decrease pressure to fix the real bug (and I guess it is one) in WLS.
On the other hand: If the "multiple WARs in an EAR config" that Ari Meyer
describes is a common pattern (that I'm not aware of, but I have no experience
with EAR) then the code emitting the warning might be based on wrong
assumptions and is probably superfluous.
I honestly don't know, that's why I'm asking for the documentation of this
behavior.
Matthew, are you having a link to the filed bug or is it confidential. It would
probably be worthwhile to follow the discussion in that bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
