Not the Slider releases but the app packages themselves - considering QE
team will test only one version. I am referring to the app packages
released by HWX. I guess, after Champlain we will have two tested versions
of say HBase on Slider and at that point we can package more than one
tarball into the same package.


On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Steve Loughran <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 19 July 2014 18:24, Sumit Mohanty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If a package author wants to pack multiple tarballs and a directive to
> > switch between them through appConfig they can do so. In my opinion, our
> > packages should not be that way as at any given point HDP release only
> has
> > one specific version for each and thus the Slider App package should also
> > contain the same version.
> >
>
> but we aren't constraining slider releases to be in sync with any hadoop
> deployment -or the artifacts they deploy.
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Billie Rinaldi <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > There is also the app def property in app config that tells the name of
> > the
> > > app package in HDFS. Currently this would have the Accumulo version in
> it
> > > as well. You can name the app package anything you want, but if you're
> > > working with multiple packages for different app versions (which seems
> to
> > > be Ted's motivation), it would get confusing fast if you couldn't
> > > distinguish them by the package name.
> > >
> > > And there's the app_root. That's the name of the untarred app
> directory,
> > > which also contains the version.
> > >
> > > So until we figure out ways to address all these issues, you're stuck
> > with
> > > with a different app config for each package.
> > > On Jul 19, 2014 10:42 AM, "Jon Maron" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If we limit the package to one app, is there a need for specifying
> the
> > > > version at all?  If we do specify it, should it be regarded as the
> > > > displayed version or application name value rather than a specific
> file
> > > > name?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Jul 19, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > Currently user has to specify the version in package_list of
> > > > appConfig.json
> > > > > :
> > > > >    "package_list": "files/accumulo-${accumulo.version}-bin.tar.gz",
> > > > >
> > > > > I wonder if we should allow for multiple versions (through
> wildcard).
> > > > > The rationale is that there is only one tar ball under
> package/files
> > > > > directory inside the app package.
> > > > > By allowing multiple versions, user can use the same appConfig.json
> > for
> > > > > different app packages (corresponding to different releases of the
> > > > > underlying app).
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > entity
> > > to
> > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified
> > > that
> > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > immediately
> > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > thanks
> > Sumit
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>



-- 
thanks
Sumit

Reply via email to