Considering going forward it will be 2.6 only it might be OK. Should we tag the last release candidate as one for hadoop 2.4 for folks to sync to that tag if they need to?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Steve Loughran <[email protected]> wrote: > I never got around to doing the final bit of the release: taking it to > incubator general. > > How about we skip that release as an official release and i do one of the > latest code > > The biggest argument against this is that it's hadoop 2.6 only, so the #of > users will be low > > -steve > > -- > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
