Hi Ian, Ian Boston schrieb: > On 10 Dec 2009, at 13:08, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >>> 1. >>> Would it be acceptable to add some of these properties back into the >>> AuthorizableValueMap so that the response become useful ? >>> >>> eg >>> >>> rep:principalName >>> rep:userId >>> rep:referees >>> rep:groups >>> rep:impersonators >> I could well imagine that Sling could be extended to still return these >> as part of its AuthorizableResource ValueMap as. Where rep:userId would >> probably be just rep:id and another (boolean) property rep:isGroup would >> be added to represent the authorizable as a group instead of a user. >> >> of course returning a rep:password property does not make any sense (as >> you said). > > > Looking at AuthorizableValueMap, this looks like a small patch. in read() and > readFully(), > I will work up a patch and push to jira.
Ok, thanks. Regards Felix
