On 2/10/10 2:37 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Justin Edelson wrote: >> Thanks for your feedback. What do you think about SessionConfigurer as >> the interface name? > > I see the interface but I fail to see a use case for this :) > I'm not against it, but just curious why this is needed.
As I mentioned earlier, my specific use case is to register namespace prefixes in the session-local registry. I suspect that other uses of this SessionConfigurer function will arise in the future, but this is the only one I have for now. Justin > > Regards > Carsten >
