Actually, I would point the License link on any main TLP website at the
overview page, since it's pretty obvious from there what the specific
legal license is, and because it provides a useful overview.
I'd agree that any License links in software code or releases themselves
should point at the specific LICENSE-2.0 itself, like you suggest. But
I think a top level link on the main websites is best to go to the
License overview page.
Any other opinions on tradema...@?
- Shane
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to bing the Sling site up to speed with the branding
requirements [1] it occurred to me that the section "Website Navigation
Links" requires a License link as follows:
"License" should link to: http://www.apache.org/licenses/
IMHO the "License" link should point to the actual license, which would
be http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 almost all the times.
Am I off-track ?
Thanks and Regards
Felix
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
(second try with the correct Trademarks PMC address)
