[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17312254#comment-17312254
 ] 

Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SLING-10269:
---------------------------------------------

I'm not sure if the caching as implemented at PR#43 works, using cache keys 
which are based on the current resource type + the resource type being checked 
for.

Supertypes are defined by each Resource's {{sling:resourceSuperType}} property.

In theory they should be consistent but in practice it's very possible for a 
resource A to have type=T1 and supertype=TS, while another resource B has 
type=T1 and supertype=TX. Not a good idea probably but possible according to 
the current (absence of) rules.

In this case, without caching {{isResourceType(A,TS)}} returns true and 
{{isResourceType(B,TS}} returns false.

With the PR#43 caching i think both will return the same value which depends on 
which one is called first.

> cache results of isResourceType()
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-10269
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10269
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ResourceResolver
>    Affects Versions: Resource Resolver 1.7.2
>            Reporter: Joerg Hoh
>            Assignee: Joerg Hoh
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have code, which uses {noformat}resourceResolver.isResourceType(Resource, 
> String){noformat} very often to determine type information. I also observed, 
> that the execution time of this method contributes a lot to the overall 
> execution time.
> Also the number of unique resourcetypes which are going to be checked 
> (resource.getResourceType, 1st parameter) is typically quite low; the same 
> applies for the number of resourcetypes it is compared against. So it makes 
> sense to cache the result of that method call in map which shares the 
> lifetime of the ResourceResolver, as the result will never change during this 
> lifetime. But during a refresh() this map can be cleared, so any changes in 
> the RT hierarchy which might have happened will get effective.
> I have tested this approach already and it gives a significant speedup to my 
> code (reduced execution time by 50%); of course this cannot be expected 
> universally, as this is an extreme case, but it shows that there is indeed a 
> bit of overhead.
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/pull/43



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to