[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12992554#comment-12992554
 ] 

Jukka Zitting commented on SLING-1974:
--------------------------------------

The HTTP spec doesn't specify any ordering for the values and some clients may 
use a non-deterministic ordering (e.g. hash set), so relying on the ordering 
might cause unexpected results in some cases. A better approach might be to use 
explicit server-side preferences (like text/html over application/json) or 
alphabetic ordering as a deterministic fallback.

See also http://www.neeraj.name/2010/11/23/mime-type-resolution-in-rails.html 
(and especially Erik's comment) for a good discussion of related issues.

> Accept header issues in the Sling POST Servlet
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-1974
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1974
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Servlets
>    Affects Versions: Servlets Post 2.1.0
>            Reporter: Felix Meschberger
>             Fix For: Servlets Post 2.1.2
>
>
> As of SLING-1336 the Sling POST Servlet can interpret the Accept request 
> header to select what response content type to render.
> Unfortunately that handling seems broken as for an Accept header like (as 
> generated by FireFox with the JSONovich plugin installed) :
>    Accept: 
> text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8,application/json
> the JSON response might be selected but sometimes also text/html (we can 
> observe both behaviours for different server platforms with our application).
> The Accept header should probably consider equivalent q values (as for 
> text/html and application/json in the example) to solve the tie by selecting 
> the first type list; thus text/html in this example.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to