[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17333334#comment-17333334
]
Bertrand Delacretaz edited comment on SLING-10333 at 4/27/21, 3:26 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Implemented in commits d11efee (parser) and fcad90a (jcr-repoinit)
Note that the JCR repoinit module doesn't check the user type, so {{delete
service user}} works for regular users in previous versions. I haven't changed
that as that might break existing repoinit scripts, so in the end my changes
are only to support the syntax without "service" and check that it works.
was (Author: bdelacretaz):
Implemented in commits d11efee (parser) and fcad90a (jcr-repoinit)
Note that the JCR repoinit module doesn't check the user type, so {{delete
service user}} works for regular users in previous versions. I haven't changed
that and that might break existing repoinit scripts, so in the end my changes
are only to support the syntax without "service" and check that it works.
> Repoinit: allow for disabling regular (non-service) users
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-10333
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10333
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Repoinit
> Affects Versions: Repoinit Parser 1.6.6, Repoinit JCR 1.1.34
> Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Repoinit Parser 1.6.8, Repoinit JCR 1.1.36
>
>
> In SLING-6984 we added a {{disable service user}} statement to repoinit.
> Shouldn't we have the same functionality for regular users?
> [~angela], as you know the Oak security features much better than I do, does
> anything speak against a {{disable user}} statement?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
