Hi team

Looking at the Project Archetype I see that I did not add support for FMs. So I 
was wondering if that would be something you might be interested.
I was thinking to keep the current code / layout around with Bundle and Content 
Package(s) but add support for FMs and FARs.

This would require:

- Add a ‘far’ module that creates a FM and FAR like the All does
- Migrate the rest to be able to generate FMs and convert if needed
- Added a Bundle Content Module for the traditional and FM version
- Use the post processing to remove unwanted modules or parts of them
- Use kickstart to test the deployment of the FM / FAR module

Cheers - Andy

> On Oct 8, 2021, at 12:34 PM, Andreas Schaefer <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I did not work on the Project Archetype for a while but I am going to have a 
> look into it with respect to FMs.
> There were some suggestions on how to improve it a while back and I will try 
> to find them again.
> 
> Cheers - Andy
> 
>> On Oct 8, 2021, at 8:01 AM, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 08:44 -0400, Cris Rockwell wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>>> Shall we mark those archetypes as deprecated for now?
>>> Yes. I can make that update to the site (if no one objects). It makes
>>> sense to deprecate broken archetypes, at least temporarily. These
>>> provide an initial starting point for developers looking to try the
>>> framework, so I think they should not only work properly but also
>>> have good documentation if possible. I also understand resource
>>> constraints.
>> 
>> +1 from me.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I would be in favour of just maintaing the sling-project-archetype
>>>> and
>>>> making sure that a) it works and b) is a reasonable starting point
>>>> for
>>>> Sling-based apps.
>>> 
>>> FYI. I used sling-project-archetype two days ago. It worked well for
>>> me. It provided a reasonable starting basis for my new project.
>> 
>> Good to know, thanks.
>> Robert
> 

Reply via email to