[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17441603#comment-17441603
]
Angela Schreiber commented on SLING-10914:
------------------------------------------
[~Sc0rpic0m], i agree with the proposal in general.... however, it is important
to understand that jackrabbit filevault will actually install content _even_ if
it is NOT covered by the filter.... so relying on the original filter
definition will most likely cause major regressions..... see SLING-10760 and
SLING-10754.
in other words: past bugs have shown that customers actually rely on those
undocumented features (or bugs?) in filevault and solely relying on the
original filter.xml to determined what content needs to be installed will not
work.
cc: [~karlpauls]
> CpConverter - package calculation should be based on filters
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-10914
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10914
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Content-Package to Feature Model Converter
> Reporter: Niek Raaijmakers
> Assignee: Niek Raaijmakers
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Content-Package to Feature Model Converter 1.1.12
>
>
> As of now, the package (re)calculation being performed is done on the basis
> of package contents.
> Instead what it should be calculated on is the package filter. Because an
> empty "nuke filter" can be used as well, to clear out paths.
> Therefore to avoid collision, the package filters should be used as leading
> indicator.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
