On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Eric Norman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>
> Maybe it is ok to just pass the ItemId to the AccessManagerPlugin2#canRead
> method as a string?

That'd solve the export problem, but the question remains - what would
an implementor of AccessManagerPlugin2 actually *do* with this value?

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Justin Edelson 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I made a few comments. Mostly API version bumps which aren't AFAIK
>> necessary.
>>
>> The bigger issue, to me, is the AccessManagerPlugin2 interface's use
>> of org.apache.jackrabbit.core.id.ItemId. This is *not* a Jackrabbit
>> API class and I have my doubts that we should be exporting it (as I
>> did in my patch).
>>
>> Is it actually possible to implement AccessManagerPlugin2 and do
>> anything of import with the ItemID parameter?
>>
>> I'll take a look at the Tika issue. Did you try 0.9?
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Eric Norman <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Moving further discussion to the dev list...
>> > Thanks Justin,
>> > I almost got it working using your patch + some other changes.
>> > See the diffs @ http://codereview.appspot.com/4345041/
>> > Now I hit an issue loading the tika parsers that was described @
>> > http://jackrabbit.markmail.org/thread/k5fhbkbs774buv4w
>> > Any suggestions on how to workaround that?
>> > If I use version 0.6 of the tika bundle the repository will start but
>> throws
>> > NPE when extracting text for the search index:
>> > 31.03.2011 17:38:35.968 *WARN* [jackrabbit-pool-1]
>> > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.LazyTextExtractorField Failed to
>> > extract text from a binary
>> >  property java.lang.NullPointerException
>> >         at
>> > org.apache.tika.parser.AutoDetectParser.parse(AutoDetectParser.java:92)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.JackrabbitParser.parse(JackrabbitParser.java:192)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.LazyTextExtractorField$ParsingTask.run(LazyTextExtractorField.java:174)
>> >
>> > If I use version 0.8 of the tika bundle it throws a RuntimeException that
>> > makes the repository not start properly:
>> > 31.03.2011 17:43:13.171 *INFO* [Repository Pinger]
>> > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl Repository has been shutdown
>> > 31.03.2011 17:43:13.171 *ERROR* [Repository Pinger]
>> > org.apache.sling.jcr.jackrabbit.server startRepository: Uncaught
>> Throwable
>> > trying to access Reposi
>> > tory, calling stopRepository() (java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to
>> load
>> > embedded Tika configuration) java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to load
>> emb
>> > edded Tika configuration
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.JackrabbitParser.<init>(JackrabbitParser.java:91)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.SearchIndex.<init>(SearchIndex.java:211)
>> >         at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native
>> > Method)
>> >         at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown
>> > Source)
>> >         at
>> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown
>> > Source)
>> >         at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source)
>> >         at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Unknown Source)
>> >         at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Unknown Source)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.config.BeanConfig.newInstance(BeanConfig.java:189)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.config.RepositoryConfigurationParser$1.getQueryHandler(RepositoryConfigurationParser.java:631)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.config.RepositoryConfig.getQueryHandler(RepositoryConfig.java:1032)
>> >         at
>> > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.SearchManager.<init>(SearchManager.java:174)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.getSystemSearchManager(RepositoryImpl.java:630)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.access$100(RepositoryImpl.java:124)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl$WorkspaceInfo.getSearchManager(RepositoryImpl.java:1860)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl$WorkspaceInfo.doPostInitialize(RepositoryImpl.java:2095)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl$WorkspaceInfo.initialize(RepositoryImpl.java:2000)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.initStartupWorkspaces(RepositoryImpl.java:533)
>> >         at
>> > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.<init>(RepositoryImpl.java:342)
>> >         at
>> > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.RepositoryImpl.create(RepositoryImpl.java:605)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.sling.jcr.jackrabbit.server.impl.SlingServerRepository.acquireRepository(SlingServerRepository.java:160)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.sling.jcr.base.AbstractSlingRepository.startRepository(AbstractSlingRepository.java:787)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.sling.jcr.base.AbstractSlingRepository.run(AbstractSlingRepository.java:917)
>> >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>> > Caused by: org.apache.tika.exception.TikaException: Configured parser
>> class
>> > not found: org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.pdf.PDFParser
>> >         at org.apache.tika.config.TikaConfig.<init>(TikaConfig.java:151)
>> >         at org.apache.tika.config.TikaConfig.<init>(TikaConfig.java:98)
>> >         at org.apache.tika.config.TikaConfig.<init>(TikaConfig.java:85)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.lucene.JackrabbitParser.<init>(JackrabbitParser.java:82)
>> >         ... 23 more
>> > Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>> > org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.pdf.PDFParser
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.felix.framework.ModuleImpl.findClassOrResourceByDelegation(ModuleImpl.java:814)
>> >         at
>> > org.apache.felix.framework.ModuleImpl.access$100(ModuleImpl.java:61)
>> >         at
>> >
>> org.apache.felix.framework.ModuleImpl$ModuleClassLoader.loadClass(ModuleImpl.java:1733)
>> >         at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
>> >         at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
>> >         at java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source)
>> >         at org.apache.tika.config.TikaConfig.<init>(TikaConfig.java:125)
>> >         ... 26 more
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Eric
>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Justin Edelson <
>> [email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Craig Ganoe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > As I said in one of my longer emails, the only Sling code change I
>> >> > noticed is that Sling's PluggableDefaultAccessManager makes a call to
>> >> > canRead(itemPath) on its superclass in Jackrabbit -
>> DefaultAccessManager.
>> >> > For some reason unclear to me they changed it in from just taking a
>> path as
>> >> > a parameter in 2.1 to taking both a path and an item ID in 2.2, but
>> then the
>> >> > JavaDocs say either one of the parameters can be null.
>> >>
>> >> This was discussed both on sling-dev and jackrabbit-dev. IIRC, it was
>> >> actually done in 2.1.3. I posted a potential patch on sling-dev when
>> this
>> >> initially came up.
>> >>
>> >> Justin
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I made a little progress today, but unfortunately, due to the
>> >> > absurdities of today's build tools, I'm stuck with a bunch of vague
>> messages
>> >> > that have nothing to do with actually building the software. That
>> today you
>> >> > can't replace a few libraries and a few lines of code and still build
>> >> > software without causing miles of vague errors that have nothing to do
>> with
>> >> > the compilability of the actual code is ridiculous.
>> >> >
>> >> > [INFO] Scanning for projects...
>> >> > [WARNING]
>> >> > [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective
>> >> > model for
>> >> >
>> org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.testing.samples.integrationtests:jar:0.1.1-SNAPSHOT
>> >> > [WARNING]
>> 'dependencies.dependency.(groupId:artifactId:type:classifier)'
>> >> > must be unique: org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.junit.remote:jar ->
>> >> > duplicate declaration of version 0.1.1-SNAPSHOT @ line 272, column 21
>> >> > [WARNING]
>> 'dependencies.dependency.(groupId:artifactId:type:classifier)'
>> >> > must be unique: org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.testing.tools:jar ->
>> >> > duplicate declaration of version 0.1.1-SNAPSHOT @ line 277, column 21
>> >> > [WARNING]
>> >> > [WARNING] It is highly recommended to fix these problems because they
>> >> > threaten the stability of your build.
>> >> > [WARNING]
>> >> > [WARNING] For this reason, future Maven versions might no longer
>> support
>> >> > building such malformed projects.
>> >> > [WARNING]
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mar 31, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Eric Norman wrote:
>> >> >> Hi All,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I found a use case where I could also use an upgrade to jackrabbit
>> >> >> 2.2.5 to
>> >> >> utilize some changes in user/group management.  I filed JIRA
>> >> >> issue SLING-2044 for tracking and will attempt the upgrade today.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Regards,
>> >> >> Eric
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Justin Edelson
>> >> >> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Ian Boston <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On 25 Mar 2011, at 12:54, Justin Edelson wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Ian Boston <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> On 24 Mar 2011, at 20:44, Craig Ganoe wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Is there any documentation for upgrading the jackrabbit version
>> in
>> >> >>>>>>> the
>> >> >>> Sling build?
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> AFAIK, there is not.
>> >> >>>>>> Ian
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> There is, in a sense. Look at JIRA and Subversion and you'll see
>> the
>> >> >>> exact set of changes made for prior upgrades.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> good point,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion%3Asubversion-commits-tabpanel#issue-tabs
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=987559
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> was that the right issue ?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> SLING-1531 too...
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Ian
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Justin
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Thanks.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Craig
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to