[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17610942#comment-17610942
 ] 

Joerg Hoh edited comment on SLING-11601 at 10/27/22 4:00 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

PR for Scripting Sightly: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-scripting-sightly/pull/21 
(merged)

(I was not able to convert all instances to LazyBindings, because the 
LazyBindings do not offer a matching Constructor to just accept the un-wrapped 
values).


was (Author: joerghoh):
PR for Scripting Sightly: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-scripting-sightly/pull/21

(I was not able to convert all instances to LazyBindings, because the 
LazyBindings do not offer a matching Constructor to just accept the un-wrapped 
values).

> [Scripting] Use the LazyBindings instead of SimpleBindings
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-11601
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11601
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Sling Models
>    Affects Versions: Sling Models Impl 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Joerg Hoh
>            Assignee: Joerg Hoh
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> At various modules Sling Scripting (and Sling Models) code still uses a 
> {{SimpleBindings}} implementation of the {{{}Bindings{}}}, while it could use 
> {{LazyBindings}} which are more efficient in case not all provided bindings 
> are required.
> While the scripting itself does not necessarily use a 
> {{LazyBindings.Supplier}}, other {{BindingValueProviders}} can be invoked on 
> them, which do support the LazyBindings; and in that case there can be a 
> benefit.
> Requires a bump of the dependency to Sling API though (at least 2.21.0 is 
> required)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to