joerghoh commented on code in PR #99:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-resourceresolver/pull/99#discussion_r1315014292


##########
src/main/java/org/apache/sling/resourceresolver/impl/mapping/MapEntries.java:
##########
@@ -1407,15 +1417,17 @@ private Map<String, List<String>> 
loadVanityPaths(ResourceResolver resolver) {
             }
         }
         long processElapsed = System.nanoTime() - processStart;
-        log.debug("processed {} vanityPaths (of which {} in scope) in {}ms", 
count, countInScope, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(processElapsed));
+        log.debug("processed {} resources with sling:vanityPath properties (of 
which {} in scope) in {}ms", count, countInScope, 
TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(processElapsed));
         if (!isAllVanityPathEntriesCached()) {
             if (countInScope > this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries()) {
-                log.warn("Number of vanity paths in scope ({}) exceeds 
configured cache size ({}); handling of uncached vanity paths will be much 
slower. Consider increasing the cache size or decreasing the number of vanity 
paths.", countInScope, this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());
+                log.warn("Number of resources with sling:vanityPath properties 
({}) exceeds configured cache size ({}); handling of uncached vanity paths will 
be much slower. Consider increasing the cache size or decreasing the number of 
vanity paths.", countInScope, this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());
             } else if (countInScope > 
(this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries() / 10) * 9) {
-                log.info("Number of vanity paths in scope ({}) within 10% of 
configured cache size ({})", countInScope, 
this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());
+                log.info("Number of resources with sling:vanityPath properties 
in scope ({}) within 10% of configured cache size ({})", countInScope, 
this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());

Review Comment:
   ```suggestion
                   log.info("Number of resources with sling:vanityPath property 
in scope ({}) within 10% of configured cache size ({})", countInScope, 
this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());
   ```



##########
src/main/java/org/apache/sling/resourceresolver/impl/mapping/MapEntries.java:
##########
@@ -1407,15 +1417,17 @@ private Map<String, List<String>> 
loadVanityPaths(ResourceResolver resolver) {
             }
         }
         long processElapsed = System.nanoTime() - processStart;
-        log.debug("processed {} vanityPaths (of which {} in scope) in {}ms", 
count, countInScope, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(processElapsed));
+        log.debug("processed {} resources with sling:vanityPath properties (of 
which {} in scope) in {}ms", count, countInScope, 
TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(processElapsed));
         if (!isAllVanityPathEntriesCached()) {
             if (countInScope > this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries()) {
-                log.warn("Number of vanity paths in scope ({}) exceeds 
configured cache size ({}); handling of uncached vanity paths will be much 
slower. Consider increasing the cache size or decreasing the number of vanity 
paths.", countInScope, this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());
+                log.warn("Number of resources with sling:vanityPath properties 
({}) exceeds configured cache size ({}); handling of uncached vanity paths will 
be much slower. Consider increasing the cache size or decreasing the number of 
vanity paths.", countInScope, this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());

Review Comment:
   ```suggestion
                   log.warn("Number of resources with sling:vanityPath property 
({}) exceeds configured cache size ({}); handling of uncached vanity paths will 
be much slower. Consider increasing the cache size or decreasing the number of 
vanity paths.", countInScope, this.factory.getMaxCachedVanityPathEntries());
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to