2011/11/16 Jukka Zitting <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> > wrote: >> For use cases you might have in mind, we have the partial bundle list >> which is a well defined list of modules. > > My point is that it would be very convenient if I *could* use > transitive dependencies (and other standard Maven dependency features) > to produce the partial bundle list. That way I wouldn't have to > maintain the dependency information in two different places. > > Of course it's good if there's way to explicitly override certain > dependencies, but for the most part my existing Maven dependency tree > already contains a perfectly good starting point for the bundle list. > Having to duplicate that information just opens up the risk of > accidental inconsistencies. > Yes, and I guess this is the core where we disagree - I really want to avoid transitive dependencies and other magic for defining a (partial) bundle list. In my opinion it should be a complete list
Let's see what others think :) Regards Carsten > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
