On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/11/23 Mike Müller <[email protected]>: >> I think the discussion here is missunderstood. It's neither about >> to redefine existing ACLs nor about reinventing something already >> existing...
Well, this thread's subject says "improving access control" ;-) > Exactly, thanks Mike :) Then, let's make sure we don't call this "access control". I purposely used "ResourceAccessGate" as my example interface name earlier in this thread - such a name probably helps avoid confusion. -Bertrand
