On Fri, 2025-04-11 at 17:19 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: > Both 1.3 and 2.0 as next version is fine for me. > Konrad
Adjusted to 1.3.0 and 1.3.2. My plan is to fix SLING-7599 [1] and then start using the IDE for various projects, to smoke out any problems that may be lurking. With regards to SLING-12108 [2] I will mostly test with 2025-03 but it would be good for others to test as well once SLING-7599 is done. Thanks, Robert [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7599 [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-12108 > > > On 11. Apr 2025, at 17:03, Robert Munteanu <romb...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 09:37 +0200, Konrad Windszus wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > This plan sounds good to me. > > > Let me know in case of questions related to signing: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Sling+IDE+tooling+-+Signing > > > We should definitely switch to GPG signing in the midterm as that > > > is > > > built into Tycho > > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-11680) > > > but I haven’t tried it out yet. > > > Thanks for taking it up, > > > Konrad > > > > In the meantime I managed to apply some fixes for Windows support > > and I > > think we should be at least at the same level as before the big > > refactoring. > > > > There are now 4 issues targeted for 2.0 [1], 2 of which are about > > the > > release process and automation. I would not add anything else > > unless > > it's a show-stopper and start the release process once we have the > > code > > fixes in. > > > > I would also reconsider the plan to call this release 2.0 because > > it > > really does not change anything fundamental for the user. Yes, we > > did > > the big split and now have a more flexible API that other IDEs can > > use > > but this is not a user-facing benefit in any way. My proposal is > > for > > the next release to be 1.3.0 instead. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Thanks, > > Robert > > > > [1]: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SLING%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Sling%20Eclipse%20IDE%202.0.0%22%20and%20resolution%20is%20empty
