Hi Roy,

On Fri, 2026-06-26 at 21:28 +0200, Roy Teeuwen wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've been working on extending the Sling Committer CLI
> (https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-committer-cli) so
> it can drive a release end-to-end, and I'd like to get some feedback
> before going further.
> 
> What's new in the CLI
> 
> The CLI previously stopped at the vote email. The PR adds the post-
> vote half of the workflow so the whole release can be driven from the
> tool:
> 
> - "tally-votes" is now PMC-aware: the [RESULT] email auto-detects
> (via Whimsy) whether the release manager is a PMC member and asks a
> PMC member to do the dist upload if not
> - "close-staging" — closes an open staging repo, deriving the
> description from the staged POM's <name>/<version> (works even before
> the repo is in the Lucene index)
> - "verify" — checks PGP signatures, SHA-1/MD5 and CI status
> - "promote / drop" — promote a closed repo to Maven Central, or drop
> it on a failed vote
> - "update-dist" — copies the release to dist.apache.org (PMC-only;
> previous version auto-deduced)

This is very cool!

> 
> And, to make it as easy as possible: "finalize" — one step that runs
> promote → update-dist (PMC) → next JIRA version → release JIRA
> version → update Apache Reporter
> 
> I have a matching change for the website's release-management
> (https://github.com/apache/sling-site) page that documents the CLI as
> the recommended path, updates the GPG/settings.xml prerequisites for
> maven-gpg-plugin 3.x, and clarifies the PMC-vs-committer split for
> the dist upload.
> 
> The PR also includes a skills/sling-release/SKILL.md — a playbook
> that lets an AI coding agent drive the release using the CLI:
> prerequisites to verify, the ordered Maven + CLI steps, DRY_RUN-
> before-AUTO safety rules, and a quick command reference. It encodes
> the same process the README documents, just in a form an agent can
> follow.
> 
> Open questions:
> 
> 1. Do we want an agent skill file living in the committer-cli repo?
> The current ones are in the whiteboard, not sure if we want to go for
> SKILLs per dedicated repo, or one big repo with SKILLs

I would slightly prefer a skill repos. The reason is that I would not
expect everyone to clone the committer CLI - we should push it to
docker hub so the clone + build step is omitted. So then it makes sense
to install skills from a central repo.

> 2. I am not a PMC member, so I am not able to test the actual dist
> command (either seperatly or in the finalize command). Is there a PMC
> member who is willing to test it? The resource resolver still has a
> release active that can be closed and has all the votes
> 3. Go ahead and review my PRs and give feedback if wanted, I updated
> the release documentation to more point to the automated flow than
> manual steps:

I did not yet look in depth at the PRs but for the skill I'd encourage
you to take a look at [1]. It's really fresh and active and it might
make sense to join efforts.

Thanks,
Robert

> -
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-committer-cli/pull/28
> - https://github.com/apache/sling-site/pull/282
> 
> Greets,
> Roy


[1]: https://magpie.apache.org/skills/release-management/readme/

Reply via email to