On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi, > > yes, this stripping is really annoying but required - otherwise > downstream users would have to deal with the details of JCR. Are these > two events triggered by the same observation call, so maybe we could > combine them into a single event? > That's a good idea. I'd also like to see the jcr:content attribute names prefixed with jcr:content in the event properties. You can't not deal with the details of JCR sometimes :) Justin > Regards > Carsten > > 2012/5/15 Justin Edelson <[email protected]>: > > In JcrResourceListener, there's some code which strips off the > > "jcr:content" path segment. This results in two events being produced > with > > the same path event property, but with different attributes, when, for > > example, a file is uploaded. It seems like we should have some way > (another > > event property?) to differentiate between these two events. WDYT? > > > > Justin > > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected] >
