+1

Carsten

2012/6/12 Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>:
> Same here
>
> +1
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Felix
>
> Am 11.06.2012 um 09:53 schrieb Mike Müller:
>
>> Hi Carsten
>>
>> Thank you for bringing up this again.
>> A think this major change could bring Sling a lot forward and
>> maybe gives us the chance to get a broader user base.
>> And making things independent from each other is a good
>> idea anyway ;-)
>>
>> so, a big +1
>>
>> best regards
>> mike
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 5:19 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Moving SLING-2396 to trunk
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I really would like to move forward with SLING-2396 (Make
>>> ResourceResolverFactory independent from JCR) in order to implement
>>> other features (like CRUD support for the resource resolver) on top of
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this change introduces an incompatibility wrt
>>> workspaces, therefore I thought it's safer to call a vote and see what
>>> the community things about it.
>>> The vote is not about implementing SLING-2396 in exactly the way it is
>>> right now, its just to move the code to trunk and continue to work
>>> there.
>>>
>>> For the workspace support, right now, it's possible to address other
>>> workspaces by specifying an artificial path {workspacename}:{/path} .
>>> This won't be possible anymore, however it would be possible to mount
>>> a workspace at any path in the resource tree (and that would happen on
>>> demand).
>>>
>>> I think, if someone really needs the special path access to a
>>> workspace like it is today, then we could add a wrapper for the
>>> resource resolver which does this special logic in the wrapper.
>>> However, if we don't need it, i don't want to spent time on that :)
>>>
>>> I think SLING-2396 is one of the most important changes to our code
>>> base, which will make it easier to implement new features in the
>>> resource resolving area, e.g. we get adding different search providers
>>> for free etc.
>>>
>>> Please vote, thanks :)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Carsten
>>> --
>>> Carsten Ziegeler
>>> [email protected]
>



-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
[email protected]

Reply via email to