On 19.02.2013, at 13:25, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not seeing how SLING-2670 changes the picture, it just makes > accessing the suffix easier, but still the extension is appended to > the existing resource, so it's still: > http://host/bin/sample.ext/some/more/info > and not http://host/bin/sample/some/more/info.ext > > As this already works with servlets, I don't feel we should change this. > > The use case in SLING-2726 can easily be implemented with a very > simple resource provider, the use case of SLING-2670 works with > servlets. So unless we have a different use case, I think we should > leave it as is. +1 Cheers, Alex
