Hi, Does changing "FROM sling:VanityPath" to "FROM nt:base" have any noticeable impact on performance or cost of the query ? Ian
On 20 February 2013 23:44, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable, this would be in line with the usage of sling:resourceType. > > Carsten > > 2013/2/20 Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>: >> Hi all >> >> I just noticed that the query to setup vanity path configurations is like >> this: >> >>> SELECT sling:vanityPath, sling:redirect, sling:redirectStatus >>> FROM sling:VanityPath >>> WHERE sling:vanityPath IS NOT NULL >>> ORDER BY sling:vanityOrder DESC >> >> Which means that to enable a vanity path the respective node must have the >> sling:VanityPath mixin property set. >> >> I think the mixin should be used to help configure the vanity path >> properties but it should not be a requirement to configure such paths. Thus >> I think the FROM part should actually read: >> >>> FROM nt:base >> >> Thus accepting any node provided the properties are set. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Regards >> Felix > > > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [email protected]
